A TV International
interview with Hamid Taqvaee on the 99% movement broadcast on 20 November 2011.
Maryam Namazi: I have begun my weekly TV programmes again broadcast via New Channel TV to the Middle East and other countries via satellite after a long hiatus. For my first programme back, I speak with the brilliant Hamid Taqvaee on the 99% movement. Here it is:
Maryam Namazi: I have begun my weekly TV programmes again broadcast via New Channel TV to the Middle East and other countries via satellite after a long hiatus. For my first programme back, I speak with the brilliant Hamid Taqvaee on the 99% movement. Here it is:
Maryam Namazie: The world-wide 99% protests have been amazing to see. We
keep hearing, though, that it has to do with greed. Will things improve if
there is less greed?
Hamid Taqvaee: Greed is what people refer to because that is what they
are told. When the financial crisis began, mainstream media and politicians
spoke of greed as if there were a bunch of greedy executives, bankers and major
stockholders on Wall Street who had created the entire problem. That was the
image people were given – that there may be something wrong with the system
that needed modification but the real problem was greed and greedy people.
Obviously, greed is not the reason behind the situation we find ourselves. I
mean, even if you say it is greed, the system needs greed. In reality, the
problem we faced has been created not by greedy people but by a greedy system.
And if you want the system to work you need greed and that greed is personified
in bankers and other capitalists. The problem is the system, however, not some
greedy people.
Maryam Namazie: Moreover, we often hear that the population at large is
greedy, that they are responsible for over borrowing and living a life on
credit. So, it gives the impression that it is a behavioural problem rather
than a problem with the system.
Hamid Taqvaee: The question of credit and the fact that people have to
borrow in order to live means there is no other way. People cannot be blamed
because they want to live! One cannot say that because people have had to
borrow in order to live, that they then created the problem. Again here we have
a system that works based on credit, credit to the banks, to the big companies,
to the capitalists and to people. Capitalists borrow to invest and people
borrow to spend. People are consumers; they have to borrow from the banks in
order to pay for rents or mortgages, for bills and for basically everything.
Maryam Namazie: You are saying that it is not about greed per se but
about the system itself.
Hamid Taqvaee: Yes, it is the whole system, and every part of the
system is needed by other parts. Everything matches and corresponds. The system
is based on credit cards, on mortgages, on the stock market, financial capital
and so on; it is also based on greed if you like. The whole thing works and
works this way. One cannot say some parts are good and others bad. It doesn’t
work that way.
Maryam Namazie: Some people will say that even 99% protesters are using
the products of capitalism from the social networks and tents they use to the
clothes they are wearing.
Hamid Taqvaee: Are you sure these are the products of capitalism and
not the products of workers and people, many of whom are not out of work?
Everything the Wall Street occupiers use was created by them in the first
place. The society’s wealth is created by the 99%. I don't think any
capitalist, banker, or major stockholder has ever seen a production line, or
been on a factory or in a shop floor, ever. In fact the real problem is that
the people who created all the products are the same people who cannot afford
them. They cannot even survive without borrowing from those who possess everything
without working for them – the 1%. Well, look! When you say 99% against 1%, it
is a question of wealth and the way it is shared by the population. According
to the statistics 1% of the US population owns more than 40% of the entire
wealth. Now we ask who created the wealth of this 1%? Of course the answer is
working people and not those who own the capital or the banks. It is
obvious.
Maryam Namazie: The protesters are not only against an economic system,
but inequalities that people are facing and the fact that they cannot afford
health care and many basic things any more. But it is also grievances against
the political system, which is more interesting because often parliamentary
democracy is shown to be the hope of people everywhere. What is your take on
this?
Hamid Taqvaee: There is a slogan in the movement that says both
parties, Democrat and Republican, are Wall Street parties. People know that. It
is not just a matter of how the wealth of society is distributed. The problem
is that a tiny minority, who possess the lion’s share of the wealth, are in
power as well. They run the army. They decide on all major issues, foreign
policies, national policies; they own Wall Street, and they own Congress. They
own Washington and all the lobbies. Everything! Every aspect for political
power, social power, and economic power is in the hands of 1%. It is not just a
question of wealth. It is a question of rights, of controlling the whole
society which effects every day life, politics, media, army, social matters,
cultural matters, everything. They control everything. This protest is against
the very top of the society, which controls and runs everything.
Maryam Namazie: Can you just switch financial markets off and what would
be solution?
Hamid Taqvaee: You cannot switch off part of the system, but you can
switch the whole thing off. I mean you cannot reform capitalism somehow. You
cannot have capitalism without bankers and without greed. You cannot have
capitalism without Wall Street. We cannot have capitalism without bailouts
these days and without pumping hundreds of billions or trillions of dollars
into the banking system because it has got to work. It cannot be said that
capitalism is fine and good if we could only get rid of bankers.
Maryam Namazie: So, everything is part of it – the inequality,
unemployment and social injustice?
Hamid Taqvaee: Everything is part of it.
Maryam Namazie: So, what is the solution? Socialism, it is said, is passé
and old fashioned.
Hamid Taqvaee: I do not know why the solution, i.e. Socialism, is old
fashioned! If you are jobless and you have no rights and no voice, and if the
society is still controlled by 1%,, then socialism is alive and relevant!
Socialism is about those issues. I know that the Soviet Union’s brand of
‘socialism’ is old fashioned; it is gone. But the Soviet Union had nothing to
do with Socialism in the first place. Socialism is the movement that answers
all the basic issues of our time, including the economic crisis and its
political and social consequences, and as such is relevant to the everyday life
of a majority of the people more than ever.
The socialist movement shows you how to get rid of the present system.
And that is an urgent question for everybody. This is on everyone’s minds.
People have a parliament, political parties, and ‘democracy’ but these have
nothing to do with what is going on. Our views don’t matter. Nobody is counted.
Nobody asks us what to do. The 1% make peace, they make wars, they bailout,
they impose austerity measures, and they do whatever they want whenever they
want. And the whole system has nothing to do with us until we are asked to vote
again every four years and elect somebody where all of this is going to happen
again because it is the same system. Socialism is the real solution to the
situation we face and it is not old fashioned until of course poverty and
inequality themselves become old fashioned.
Brief Introductions:
Hamid Taqvaee is the leader of Worker-Communist Party of Iran who was elected by the party’s central committee in the 4th congress of the party in the autumn of 2003.
Maryam Namazie has been a member of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran since 1995 and a member of the Party’s Central Committee since 2000.
Hamid Taqvaee is the leader of Worker-Communist Party of Iran who was elected by the party’s central committee in the 4th congress of the party in the autumn of 2003.
Maryam Namazie has been a member of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran since 1995 and a member of the Party’s Central Committee since 2000.
Mansour Hekmat was the leader and
prominent theoretician of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran since the Party’s
foundation in 1991, until his death in 2002
0 نظرات:
Post a Comment